The information
transferred through these networks is vast,mostly unfiltered and flows in an intangible area
defined as “cyberspace”. The Courts’ recent judgment in the Google case aims at setting the
boundaries to what search engine operators can and cannot do in the EU when their activities
have implications to data protection rules, by determining (i) the territorial scope of
such rules, (ii) the characterization of the activity of an internet search engine operator and
(iii) the relevance of the “right to be forgotten” in this context. In a nutshell, the Court found
that when it comes to non-EU based search engine operators, the mere existence of an affiliated
company in the EU that sells ads associated with the search engine giant creates a
presence in this territory and a data processor within the scope of the relevant EU Directive
full article at ENLR 3/2014
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi and thank you for your interest in sharing your view.
Please be aware that your message should follow the rules of creative criticism and knowledge/ideas sharing. No defamatory, insulting, hideous, hateful, inapropriate language or targeted messages would be posted.No trademark or IP violation will be allowed nor the promotion of any commercial services or products. Of course anything that can violate others' privacy is not allowed as well.
Last, but not least, mind that it is better to have a discussion than angry monologues.
That is all. Comments welcome!