The European
Commission welcomes today's judgment by the General Court (case
T-286/09) which fully upholds the Commission's 2009 Decision which found
that Intel had abused its dominant position and which imposed on Intel a
fine of €1.06 billion (see IP/09/745).
The judgment is significant because it confirms that the Commission was
fully justified in pursuing the anticompetitive conduct in question in a
major worldwide market. The Commission will continue to vigorously
pursue abuses of dominant market positions, which restrict competition
in the Single Market to the detriment of consumers.
On 13 May 2009, the Commission adopted
a decision prohibiting Intel's anticompetitive conduct under Article 7
of the EU's Antitrust Regulation (Regulation 1/2003). The decision
concluded that Intel had, in breach of Article 102 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union (ex Article 82 of the EC Treaty),
engaged in two types of abuse of its dominant position in the x86 CPU
market – i.e. essentially, the market for computer chips. These were:
(1) granting rebates to 4 PC and
server manufacturers (Dell, HP, NEC, Lenovo) conditional on them
obtaining all or almost all of their supplies from Intel, and payments
to one downstream computer retailer (Media Markt) conditional on it only
selling PCs with Intel CPUs ("conditional rebates"); and
(2) granting direct payments to 3
computer manufacturers (HP, Acer and Lenovo) to halt, delay or limit the
launch of specific products incorporating chips from Intel’s only
rival, AMD (so-called “naked restrictions”).
read full article at Europen Commission
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi and thank you for your interest in sharing your view.
Please be aware that your message should follow the rules of creative criticism and knowledge/ideas sharing. No defamatory, insulting, hideous, hateful, inapropriate language or targeted messages would be posted.No trademark or IP violation will be allowed nor the promotion of any commercial services or products. Of course anything that can violate others' privacy is not allowed as well.
Last, but not least, mind that it is better to have a discussion than angry monologues.
That is all. Comments welcome!