A US Appellate Court has ruled
that police must obtain a warrant before collecting cellphone location
data, finding that acquiring records of what cell towers a phone
connected to and when it was connected to them constitutes a Fourth
Amendment search. This ruling, from the 11th Circuit, is in opposition
to a ruling made nearly a year ago
by a separate appellate court. While this ruling won't overturn that
one because of their separate jurisdictions, it adds critical precedent
to a privacy question that's still far from decided across the country.
In its reasoning, the court notes that while the Fourth Amendment has
traditionally been applied to property rights, it's gradually expanded
to protect much more, including communications. "In the 20th century, a
second view gradually developed," the court writes, "that is, that the
Fourth Amendment guarantee protects the privacy rights of the people
without respect to whether the alleged 'search' constituted a trespass
against property rights."
... The American Civil Liberties Union was involved in arguing that the
Fourth Amendment protected cell site location data and says that the
court agreed in full with its arguments. "The court’s opinion is a
resounding defense of the Fourth Amendment’s continuing vitality in the
digital age," ACLU attorney Nathan Freed Wessler says in a statement.
"The court soundly repudiates the government’s argument that by merely
using a cell phone, people somehow surrender their privacy rights."
by (greek origin?) Jacob Kastrenakes
read full article at The Verge http://www.theverge.com/2014/6/11/5801238/warrantless-cellphone-location-tracking-illegal-us-court-rules
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi and thank you for your interest in sharing your view.
Please be aware that your message should follow the rules of creative criticism and knowledge/ideas sharing. No defamatory, insulting, hideous, hateful, inapropriate language or targeted messages would be posted.No trademark or IP violation will be allowed nor the promotion of any commercial services or products. Of course anything that can violate others' privacy is not allowed as well.
Last, but not least, mind that it is better to have a discussion than angry monologues.
That is all. Comments welcome!