In a tremendous step forward for our right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held
in United States v. Quartavious Davis that police need a warrant to
obtain historical cell phone location information from a cell service
provider. The ACLU filed an amicus brief
in the case, along with the ACLU of Florida, Electronic Frontier
Foundation, Center for Democracy & Technology, and National
Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. In April, I argued the cell phone tracking issue before a three-judge panel of the court.
This ruling is the first time a federal appeals court has held that
the Fourth Amendment requires a warrant when police seek cell phone
location records from carriers. As the court concluded: “In short, we
hold that cell site location information is within the subscriber’s
reasonable expectation of privacy. The obtaining of that data without a
warrant is a Fourth Amendment violation.”
... The court’s unequivocal opinion should also provide guidance to lawmakers grappling with electronic privacy issues. Across the country,
states have been considering legislation to require a probable cause
warrant before law enforcement tracks location in criminal
investigations. The biggest sticking point this legislative session has
been whether those bills should cover historical and real-time location
information, or just real-time tracking. There are a number of sound public policy reasons
why legislatures should adopt comprehensive bills, and the Eleventh
Circuit’s decision provides a persuasive explanation of why the Fourth
Amendment requires that outcome. Legislators now have the opportunity to
lead by enacting privacy protections for their constituents—even before
abuses reach their courthouses.
read full article at ACLU https://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty-national-security/federal-court-rules-one-major-outstanding
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi and thank you for your interest in sharing your view.
Please be aware that your message should follow the rules of creative criticism and knowledge/ideas sharing. No defamatory, insulting, hideous, hateful, inapropriate language or targeted messages would be posted.No trademark or IP violation will be allowed nor the promotion of any commercial services or products. Of course anything that can violate others' privacy is not allowed as well.
Last, but not least, mind that it is better to have a discussion than angry monologues.
That is all. Comments welcome!